Can Aggression In Dogs Be Fixed With Tools Like Electronic Collars or Prong Collars

by Will Bangura

Best Tools for Dog Aggression: Science-Based Solutions vs. Aversive Methods

Aggression in dogs is a complex issue, often misunderstood and approached with outdated methods that prioritize control over empathy and scientific understanding. This article explores the most effective tools and methods to manage aggression in dogs, emphasizing evidence-based, humane dog training practices while dismantling the argument for e-collar use in these cases. Studies in animal behavior, neuroscience, and psychology underline that behavior modification should be rooted in positive reinforcement rather than aversive tools. To address aggression comprehensively, we must consider underlying causes, such as fear, stress, and anxiety, and adopt tools that foster trust, resilience, and confidence. I am a cross-over trainer. That means I used to use corrections and tools like e-collars and or prong collars.  I am now a force-free positive reinforcement trainer.  I don’t need them even for the most difficult of behaviors.  I found that for severe behaviors like dog aggression where I offer dog training in the Phoenix Az metro area these tools often make aggression and anxiety worse in the long run.

Dog Aggression Training in Phoenix, AZ

The Root Causes of Aggression in Dogs: Why Positive Reinforcement Matters

Aggression is rarely a standalone behavior. It’s often symptomatic of deeper emotional issues, including fear, anxiety, or a lack of coping skills (Overall, 2013). Unlike aversive methods, positive reinforcement-based training can address these root causes by reshaping emotional responses rather than merely suppressing outward expressions of aggression. By focusing on positive reinforcement, we can reduce fear and anxiety, thereby decreasing the likelihood of aggression.

Research consistently supports positive reinforcement as the most effective training approach for fostering long-term behavioral change (Hiby, Rooney, & Bradshaw, 2004). Studies reveal that positive reinforcement not only improves obedience but also builds trust, reduces anxiety, and minimizes the likelihood of aggression compared to punishment-based approaches (Ziv, 2017). Importantly, these methods are shown to improve the human-animal bond, resulting in more emotionally secure and resilient dogs.

The Inefficacy and Risks of E-Collars in Addressing Aggression

The use of e-collars, or electronic shock collars, in training has been controversial, with a growing body of evidence against their use, particularly for aggression. Proponents argue that e-collars redirect attention and aid in obedience, yet studies indicate that they may exacerbate aggression by heightening a dog’s stress and anxiety.

A 2020 study published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science revealed that shock collars increase signs of stress, anxiety, and aggression, and found that dogs trained with e-collars showed more stress-related behaviors (Cooper et al., 2014). The same study reported elevated cortisol levels in dogs trained with e-collars compared to those trained with positive reinforcement, suggesting a higher state of stress.

Dr. Karen Overall, a noted veterinary behaviorist, emphasizes that punishment-based tools like e-collars do not address the underlying emotions that drive aggressive behavior (Overall, 2013). Rather, these tools suppress behaviors temporarily without resolving the root cause, risking a resurgence of aggression, often with intensified behaviors. Moreover, the learned association between the shock and a stimulus can lead to increased fear or anxiety toward the stimulus, which could lead to generalized fear and worsen aggression.

Recommended Tools for Managing Aggression: Science-Based, Humane Options

Evidence-based behavior modification focuses on tools and techniques that support positive emotional shifts, promote learning, and enhance resilience in dogs.

Clicker Training

Clicker training, a form of marker-based positive reinforcement, is an effective method to reshape behavior through precise timing and reinforcement. Clicker training allows pet parents and behaviorists to mark desirable behaviors quickly, which aids in reinforcing alternative, non-aggressive behaviors. A study by Chiandetti et al. (2016) demonstrated that clicker-trained dogs learned tasks faster and showed reduced stress compared to those trained with aversive methods.

Counterconditioning and Desensitization

Counterconditioning and desensitization are two powerful techniques widely used in behavior modification. I use these methods in almost all dog aggression training in Phoenix. Counterconditioning involves changing a dog’s emotional response to a trigger, while desensitization gradually exposes the dog to the trigger at a tolerable level, preventing overwhelming stress. This approach is highly effective for dogs with fear-based aggression, as it builds positive associations with previously threatening stimuli (Deldalle & Gaunet, 2014).

Management Tools: Harnesses, Muzzles, and Head Halters

Using management tools, such as body harnesses and head halters, can provide pet parents with better control while preventing situations that could provoke aggressive responses. Muzzles, when introduced positively, can be valuable safety tools in public settings, allowing for gradual exposure to triggers without risk. Unlike e-collars, these tools do not involve pain or fear; rather, they facilitate controlled exposure, enabling positive experiences around triggers (Herron et al., 2014).

Interactive Toys and Mental Enrichment

Aggression often arises when dogs lack appropriate outlets for energy and mental stimulation. Providing interactive toys, puzzle feeders, and mental enrichment activities can reduce stress and redirect a dog’s focus away from aggression (Lindsay, 2000). These tools encourage problem-solving, keep dogs mentally engaged, and offer positive alternatives to aggressive behaviors.

Arguing Against E-Collar Use in Aggression Cases

Close-up of a German Shepherd displaying aggressive behavior, used to illustrate the best tools and methods for managing dog aggression in a training article.

E-collar advocates like Robin Macfarlane who I respect and even trained with and learned much from in the past before I corssed-over to force-free training often claim that the tool provides a way to redirect a dog’s focus and enforce obedience, yet this ignores significant risks. Using e-collars in aggression cases presents several inherent dangers, even when used at low levels, particularly when underlying emotions like fear and anxiety drive the behavior.

Risk of Increased Anxiety and Aggression

Evidence shows that punishment, such as shock, can cause learned helplessness, where the dog may comply temporarily but is still stressed and anxious. Aversive training, by design, interrupts behavior without addressing emotional causes, which can lead to “trigger stacking,” where the dog’s suppressed aggression resurfaces more intensely later (Blackwell et al., 2012).

Ethical and Welfare Concerns

The welfare implications of shock collar use are a primary reason many countries have banned these tools. The European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology states that aversive techniques are harmful to canine welfare and urges trainers to avoid shock collars entirely (European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology, 2018). Instead, humane methods—like positive reinforcement—are widely recommended by behaviorists and veterinary organizations, including the American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior (AVSAB, 2007).

Efficacy of Positive Reinforcement Over Punishment

Studies directly comparing positive reinforcement to aversive methods indicate that positive reinforcement leads to more consistent, long-term success. Ziv (2017) found that positive reinforcement is more effective at reducing aggression over time, while punishment-based training, including shock collars, was correlated with increased aggression and stress.

The Path to Long-Term Behavioral Change: Building Trust, Not Instilling Fear

Aggression rehabilitation requires a commitment to addressing the underlying emotional state of the dog. A focus on humane tools and methods fosters lasting behavioral change, as these approaches promote positive emotional growth rather than fear or avoidance. Pet parents, trainers, and behaviorists must prioritize approaches that build confidence and address root causes to ensure ethical and effective training.

Addressing aggression in dogs requires a science-based, compassionate approach. Tools like clicker training, counterconditioning, harnesses, and mental enrichment provide safe and effective alternatives to aversive tools like e-collars. Overwhelming evidence confirms that aversive training exacerbates stress and aggression rather than resolving it. By embracing humane, positive reinforcement methods, we not only reduce aggression but also strengthen the bond between dogs and their guardians, creating a foundation of trust and security essential for a fulfilling human-animal relationship. It is advised to always seek a dog behaviorist in Phoenix who is Certified and has experience in training aggressive dogs

References

  • AVSAB. (2007). AVSAB Position Statement on Punishment. Retrieved from AVSAB Online
  • Blackwell, E. J., Twells, C., Seawright, A., & Casey, R. A. (2012). The relationship between training methods and the occurrence of behavior problems, as reported by owners, in a population of domestic dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 7(3), 150-155.
  • Chiandetti, C., Avella, S., Fongaro, E., & Cerri, F. (2016). Can clicker training facilitate conditioning in dogs? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 184, 84-93.
  • Cooper, J. J., Cracknell, N., Hardiman, J., Wright, H., & Mills, D. S. (2014). The welfare consequences and efficacy of training pet dogs with remote electronic training collars in comparison to reward-based training. PLOS ONE, 9(9), e102722.
  • Deldalle, S., & Gaunet, F. (2014). Effects of two training methods on stress-related behaviors of the dog (Canis familiaris) and on the dog-owner relationship. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 9(2), 58-65.
  • European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology. (2018). Position statement on the use of shock in dog training. Retrieved from ESVCE Online
  • Hiby, E. F., Rooney, N. J., & Bradshaw, J. W. (2004). Dog training methods: their use, effectiveness and interaction with behaviour and welfare. Animal Welfare, 13(1), 63-69.
  • Overall, K. L. (2013). Manual of Clinical Behavioral Medicine for Dogs and Cats. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  • Ziv, G. (2017). The effects of using aversive training methods in dogs: A review. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 19, 50-60.

Tells Us How We Can Help You With Your Dog. (PopUp)

Please Fill Out This Form